Moreland v. Peatry (INMATE 2)(LEAD)

Plaintiff: Devon Fred Moreland
Defendant: Lt. Peatry
Case Number: 3:2011cv00969
Filed: November 15, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
County: Chambers
Presiding Judge: Truman M. Hobbs
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 26, 2013 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 28 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; ORDERED that the Dft's 18 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; this case is DISMISSED with prejudice under 42 USC § 1997e(a) for Plf's failure to exhaust an available administrative remedy prior to filing suit; and no costs be taxed herein. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 11/26/2013. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moreland v. Peatry (INMATE 2)(LEAD)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Peatry
Represented By: Ashley Hawkins Freeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Devon Fred Moreland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?