Scott v. Officer Davis (INMATE 2)

Scott v. Officer Davis (INMATE 2)

Plaintiff:	Antonio Scott
Defendant:	Officer Davis
Case Number:	3:2012cv00226
Filed:	March 13, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Opelika Office
County:	Lee
Presiding Judge:	Truman M. Hobbs
Presiding Judge:	Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 13, 2013	Filing 36 ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the plaintiff's 34 objection is overruled; (2) the 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) Defendant Davis' 27 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the exten t Defendant seeks dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy available to him at the Lee County Detention Center with regard to the allegation presented in the complaint ; (4) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice under 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust an available administrative remedy prior to filing suit; (5) no costs be taxed herein. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 12/13/13. (djy, )
March 15, 2012	Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Lee County Detention Center. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 3/15/2012. (cc, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 13, 2013

Filing 36 ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the plaintiff's 34 objection is overruled; (2) the 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) Defendant Davis' 27 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the exten t Defendant seeks dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy available to him at the Lee County Detention Center with regard to the allegation presented in the complaint ; (4) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice under 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust an available administrative remedy prior to filing suit; (5) no costs be taxed herein. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 12/13/13. (djy, )

March 15, 2012

Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Lee County Detention Center. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 3/15/2012. (cc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Officer Davis (INMATE 2)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Davis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Scott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?