Garrett v. Lockheart et al (INMATE 1)
| Christopher Jermaine Garrett |
| Clay Stewart, Rick Mann, Sid Lockheart and Chamber County Detention Center |
| 3:2012cv00363 |
| April 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Chambers |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER AND OPINION that the 10 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of the plaintiff to comply with the orders of this court and his failure to prosecute this action. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 6/15/2012. (jg, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER AND OPINION: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 8 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1) The plf's claims against the Chambers County Detention Facility are dismissed with prejudice in accordance wi th the directives of 28 USC §1915(e)(2)(B)(I); 2) The Chambers County Detention Facility is DISMISSED as a dft in this cause of action; 3) This case, with respect to the plf's claims against dfts Lockheart, Stewart and Mann, are referred back to the magistrate judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 5/24/2012. (wcl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
