Morgan v. Saehaesung Alabama, Inc.

Morgan v. Saehaesung Alabama, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Michael Morgan
Defendant:	Saehaesung Alabama, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2012cv00816
Filed:	September 21, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Opelika Office
County:	Chambers
Presiding Judge:	Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge:	Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 8, 2014	Filing 76 JUDGMENT: The court having been informed that this cause is now settled, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT,and DECREE of the court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs andwith leave to the pa rties, within 63 days, to stipulate to a different basis for dismissal or to stipulate to the entry of judgment instead of dismissal, and with leave to any party to file, within 63 days, a motion to have the dismissal set aside and the case reinstate d or the settlement enforced, should the settlement not be consummated. It is further ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot and all pending objections are overruled as moot.The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on th e civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/8/2014. Copies furnished to calendar group, AG. (Deadlines terminated: Jury Selection and Jury Trial set for 4/14/2014.)(dmn, )

Date Filed

Document Text

April 8, 2014

Filing 76 JUDGMENT: The court having been informed that this cause is now settled, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT,and DECREE of the court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs andwith leave to the pa rties, within 63 days, to stipulate to a different basis for dismissal or to stipulate to the entry of judgment instead of dismissal, and with leave to any party to file, within 63 days, a motion to have the dismissal set aside and the case reinstate d or the settlement enforced, should the settlement not be consummated. It is further ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot and all pending objections are overruled as moot.The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on th e civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/8/2014. Copies furnished to calendar group, AG. (Deadlines terminated: Jury Selection and Jury Trial set for 4/14/2014.)(dmn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan v. Saehaesung Alabama, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Saehaesung Alabama, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Morgan
Represented By:	Daniel Eduardo Arciniegas
Represented By:	Jon Craig Goldfarb
Represented By:	Lachlan William Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?