Frazier v. Crawford, et al (INMATE 1)
| Edward Frazier |
| Clyde Knowlton, Robert J. Sewell, Thomas A. Crawford, Anthony Kather and Auburn Police Dept. |
| 3:2012cv01000 |
| November 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Madison |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER that the plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment 36 be and is hereby DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 10/16/2013. (jg, )
|
|
Filing
19
OPINION and ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 16 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: (1.) The 16 Recommendation of the Magistra te Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; (2) The plaintiff's claims against defendant Thomas A. Crawford be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (3) Defendant Crawford be and is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action; and (4) This case, with regard to the remaining defendants, be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 3/15/13. (scn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
