Lee et al v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
William M. Lee and Alfa Insurance Corporation |
International Business Machines Corporation, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Panasonic Corporation of North America and Sanyo North America Corporation |
3:2014cv00078 |
February 7, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Opelika Office |
Lee |
Terry F. Moorer |
Myron H. Thompson |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 JUDGMENT directing that, pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal (doc. no. 77 ), it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that defendants Lenovo Group Limited and Lenovo (United States) Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and terminat ed as parties, with costs taxed as paid; all claims against all other defendants remain; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; this case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on May 28, 2015. (scn, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the plfs have until 2/28/2014, to amend the complaint to allege jurisdiction sufficiently; otherwise this lawsuit shall be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/18/2014. (wcl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.