United States ex rel Dr. Brian A. Foley v. Mitchell et al
3:2014cv00135 |
November 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Opelika Office |
Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Defendants' 88 Motion to Clarify Memorandum Opinion, Correct Record, and Vacate Portion of Order Granting Leave to File Subsequent Fee Petition is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate Portion of Order Granting Leave to File Subsequent Fee Petition is DENIED as moot. It is further ORDERED that the Motion to Clarify Memorandum Opinion and Correct Record with respect to whether defendants challenged the hourly rate is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the Motion to Clarify Memorandum Opinion and Correct Record with respect to the criminal case against Dr. Mitchell is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 12/20/2019. (cnw, ) |
Filing 86 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 11/18/19. (djy, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States ex rel Dr. Brian A. Foley v. Mitchell et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.