Corley v. Prentiss Griffith Detention Center et al (INMATE 2)
| Herman Richard Corley, Jr. |
| Prentiss Griffith Detention Center, Heath Taylor, William Alexander, Steve Johnson, Gregory Thomas, Sergeant Hood, Correctional Officer Anderson and Dr. Warr |
| 3:2015cv00165 |
| March 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Russell |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION. A separate order follows. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/13/2017. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING 9 MOTION to Amend to name the Russell County Commission as a defendant; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: (1) Plf's claims against the Prentiss Griffith Detention Center and the Russell County Commissio n be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. 1915(A)(b)(1); (2) the Prentiss Griffith Detention Center and the Russell County Commission be DISMISSED as defendants to this cause of action; and (3) this case regarding plf's claims against the remaining defs be referred to the undersigned for further proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 7/13/2015. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/29/15. (djy, ) .
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
