Lilly v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 19, 2015
ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED with modification, that Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration (Doc. # 8 ) is GRANTED as to all of Plaintiff's claims against both Defendants, and that this action is STAYED pending arbitration; further ORDERED that Plaintiff Diane Lilly shall submit this dispute to arbitration in the manner provided for in the arbit ration clause in accordance with 9 U.S.C. §§ 3-4; further ORDERED that Ms. Lilly shall file a jointly prepared report regarding the status of the arbitration proceedings on or before September 18, 2015, and every ninety (90) days thereafter, until this matter is resolved. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on June 19, 2015. (scn, )
|June 2, 2015
ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 13 Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff Diane Lilly's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 1 ) is DENIED, and that Plaintiff's remaining claims are REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on June 2, 2015. (scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?