City of Phenix City, Alabama, Phenix City Red Light Safety Program v. Carroll (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
| City of Phenix City, Alabama, Phenix City Red Light Safety Program |
| Jerry Paul Carroll |
| Jerry Paul Carroll |
| City of Phenix City, Alabama, Phenix City Red Light Safety Program |
| Redflex Traffic Systems Inc. |
| 3:2015cv00748 |
| October 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Russell |
| Gray Michael Borden |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDERED that Defendant Jerry Paul Carroll's 38 motion for a stay of remand is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/12/2016. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDERED as follows: (1) Defendant's 29 objection is OVERRULED; (2) The 28 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (3) Plaintiffs' Motions to Remand (Docs. # 9 , 13 ) are GRANTED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; (4) This case is REMANDED to the Municipal Court of Phenix City, Alabama; and (5) All remaining outstanding motions (Docs. # 4 , 11 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 ) are DENIED as moot. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's 31 Motion for Disqualification and 35 Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the steps necessary to effectuate the remand. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/5/2016. (kh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
