City of Phenix City, Alabama, Phenix City Red Light Safety Program v. Carroll (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)

Plaintiff: City of Phenix City, Alabama, Phenix City Red Light Safety Program
Defendant: Jerry Paul Carroll
Counter_claimant: Jerry Paul Carroll
Counter_defendant: City of Phenix City, Alabama, Phenix City Red Light Safety Program
Movant: Redflex Traffic Systems Inc.
Case Number: 3:2015cv00748
Filed: October 9, 2015
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
County: Russell
Referring Judge: Gray Michael Borden
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 12, 2016 39 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED that Defendant Jerry Paul Carroll's 38 motion for a stay of remand is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/12/2016. (kh, )
April 5, 2016 37 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED as follows: (1) Defendant's 29 objection is OVERRULED; (2) The 28 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (3) Plaintiffs' Motions to Remand (Docs. # 9 , 13 ) are GRANTED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; (4) This case is REMANDED to the Municipal Court of Phenix City, Alabama; and (5) All remaining outstanding motions (Docs. # 4 , 11 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 ) are DENIED as moot. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's 31 Motion for Disqualification and 35 Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the steps necessary to effectuate the remand. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/5/2016. (kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City of Phenix City, Alabama, Phenix City Red Light Safety Program v. Carroll (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City of Phenix City, Alabama, Phenix City Red Light Safety Program
Represented By: Glenn Channing Gamble
Represented By: James P. Graham, Jr.
Represented By: James Robert McKoon, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry Paul Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Jerry Paul Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: City of Phenix City, Alabama, Phenix City Red Light Safety Program
Represented By: Glenn Channing Gamble
Represented By: James P. Graham, Jr.
Represented By: James Robert McKoon, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: Redflex Traffic Systems Inc.
Represented By: John Thomas Richie
Represented By: Ryan Patrick Robichaux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?