United States of America v. Anderson (JOINT ASSIGN)
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Donnie Anderson
Case Number: 3:2015mc03713
Filed: June 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Opelika Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 3203
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER (1) ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge ; (2) def's 6 Motion to Quash writ of execution is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/6/16. (djy, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Anderson (JOINT ASSIGN)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Stephen Michael Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donnie Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?