Hollis v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Middle District Hollis v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Hollis v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Plaintiff:	Shedrick D. Hollis
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	3:2016cv00351
Filed:	May 16, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Opelika Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	William Keith Watkins
Presiding Judge:	Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 28, 2019	Filing 46 ORDER, for the reasons stated in the 35 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and in the 2/20/2019 37 Order adopting the Recommendation, Petitioner's appeal is without a legal or factual basis, has no substantive merit, and is frivolous for purposes of the IFP motion; therefore, it is ORDERED that Petitioner's 45 motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/28/2019. Furnished to appeals clerk. (djy, )
February 20, 2019	Filing 37 ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. # 36 ) are OVERRULED; (2) The Recommendation (Doc. # 35 ) is ADOPTED; and. (3) Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion is DENIED. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/20/2019. (kh, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 28, 2019

Filing 46 ORDER, for the reasons stated in the 35 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and in the 2/20/2019 37 Order adopting the Recommendation, Petitioner's appeal is without a legal or factual basis, has no substantive merit, and is frivolous for purposes of the IFP motion; therefore, it is ORDERED that Petitioner's 45 motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/28/2019. Furnished to appeals clerk. (djy, )

February 20, 2019

Filing 37 ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. # 36 ) are OVERRULED; (2) The Recommendation (Doc. # 35 ) is ADOPTED; and. (3) Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion is DENIED. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/20/2019. (kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hollis v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shedrick D. Hollis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By:	Susan R. Redmond
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?