Moore v. Colvin (CONSENT)

Moore v. Colvin (CONSENT)

Plaintiff:	John Frank Moore
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	3:2016cv00408
Filed:	June 2, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Opelika Office
County:	Tallapoosa
Presiding Judge:	Gray M. Borden
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 18, 2019	Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED, pursuant to 42 USC 406(b), that counsel's 24 Motion for Award of Attorney Fees is GRANTED to the extent that the Commissioner is DIRECTED to pay Plf's attorney $20,000 from Plf's w ithheld past-due benefits for the 20.1 hours of work performed before the court; further ORDERED that counsel is DIRECTED to take the steps necessary to ensure that Plf is credited or refunded $3,875.82, the amount of fees previously awarded to Plf pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 11/18/2019. (wcl, )
September 12, 2017	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is therefore ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings. Specifically, on remand, the ALJ is instruct ed to: (1) attach a Psychiatric Review Technique Form or apply its form of analysis; and (2) determine whether Moores condition meets or equals Listing 12.05(C). A final judgment consistent with this opinion will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 9/12/2017. (kh, )

Date Filed

Document Text

November 18, 2019

Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED, pursuant to 42 USC 406(b), that counsel's 24 Motion for Award of Attorney Fees is GRANTED to the extent that the Commissioner is DIRECTED to pay Plf's attorney $20,000 from Plf's w ithheld past-due benefits for the 20.1 hours of work performed before the court; further ORDERED that counsel is DIRECTED to take the steps necessary to ensure that Plf is credited or refunded $3,875.82, the amount of fees previously awarded to Plf pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 11/18/2019. (wcl, )

September 12, 2017

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is therefore ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings. Specifically, on remand, the ALJ is instruct ed to: (1) attach a Psychiatric Review Technique Form or apply its form of analysis; and (2) determine whether Moores condition meets or equals Listing 12.05(C). A final judgment consistent with this opinion will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 9/12/2017. (kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Colvin (CONSENT)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Frank Moore
Represented By:	Anna Ludlum King
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?