Cofer v. Randolph County Sheriff's Department et al (INMATE 2)
| William Cofer, Jr. |
| Randolph County Sheriff's Department, Robert Moon and Kirby Bassett |
| 3:2016cv00586 |
| July 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Chambers |
| Gray M. Borden |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: It is ORDERED that: 1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (doc. 53 ) is ADOPTED. 2. The Defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. 23 ) is GRANTED to the extent that the Defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the Plaintiffs failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy available to him at the Randolph County Detention Facility prior to initiating this cause of action. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1997(e)(a). 4. No costs are taxed against Plaintiff. A separate Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 8/5/2019. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER that: (1) The 6 Recommendation is ADOPTED; and (2) Plaintiff's claims against the Randolph County Sheriff's Department are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/18/2016. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
