Thornton v. Mitchell et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
| Latisa Thornton |
| John W. Mitchell and The Heart Center Cardiology, P.C. |
| 3:2016cv00829 |
| October 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Lee |
| Paul W. Greene |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that: (1) The Estate's Motion to Reconsider, (Doc. 126 ), is DENIED as further set out in the opinion and order; and, (2) The Defendants' Motion to Strike, (Doc. 130 ), is DENIED as moot as further set out in the opinion and order. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 8/12/2020. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Arthur Scott Westermeyer, M.D. (Doc. 80 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Re commendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 108 ); 2. The Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony and Opinions of Kevin Sublett, M.D. (Doc. 81 ) is DENIED as moot, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Jud ge (Doc. 108 ); 3. The Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony and Opinions of Alan Bouchard, M.D. (Doc. 82 ) is DENIED, for reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 108 ); 4. The Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony a nd Opinions of Oscar Julian Booker, M.D. (Doc. 83 ) is DENIED, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 108 ); 5. The Defendants' Motion to Strike and Preclude Plaintiff's Use of Medical Literature (Doc. 92 ) is D ENIED, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 108 ); 6. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 108 ) is ADOPTED, as modified; 7. The Plaintiff's Objection (Doc. 110 ) is O VERRULED. 8. The Defendants' Limited Objection (Doc. 109 ) is SUSTAINED. 9. The Defendants' Motion to preclude Plaintiffs' experts and motion for summary judgment (Doc. 79 ) is GRANTED; and 10. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A final judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 5/5/2020. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
