Worthy et al v. The City of Phenix City, Alabama et al
| Thomas F. Worthy, James D. Adams and Willcox-Lumpkin Co., Inc. |
| The City of Phenix City, Alabama and Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv00073 |
| February 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Lee |
| Gray M. Borden |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Pending is Defendants Motion to Dismiss, which has been fully briefed (Docs. 8 9 , 15 16 , 20 21 ). This Court finds Plaintiffs have no standing to challenge the Citys procedure for contesting a citation. Indee d, there may be drivers who were cited in error and who unsuccessfully challenged their citations through that procedure, but none of those drivers is a named Plaintiff in this case. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8 ) is therefore granted as to all claims challenging the Citys procedure for contesting citations issued under the Ordinance as further set out in the opinion and order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Judge Jack Zouhary on 10/6/2017. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
