Ghioroaie-Panait v. The Board of Trustees of Auburn University et al
Plaintiff: Adrian Ghioroaie-Panait
Defendant: The Board of Trustees of Auburn University and Henry Rolle
Case Number: 3:2017cv00698
Filed: October 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Opelika Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 95 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the Court orders as follows: 1) Spry's 47 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED AS MOOT; 2) Spry's 56 Motion for Leave to Amend Answer is DENIED AS MOOT; 3) Auburn's 62 Motion for Summary Judgment and Spry's 63 Motion for Summary Judgment are due to be, and hereby are, GRANTED; 4) Rolle did not move for summary judgment, and Plf's state-law claims against him remain pending; The parties SHALL address the following at the already-scheduled pretrial conference: (1) whether the Court has jurisdiction over Plf's assault and battery claims under 18 USC 1332 and/or 18 USC 1367, and (2) whether a final judgment should be entered consistent with this order under FRCP 54(b); 5) This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Andrew L. Brasher on 1/10/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (amf, )
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER: It is ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. 35 ) is ADOPTED. It is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10 ) filed by Defendant Board of Trustees of Auburn University is DENIED as moot. 2. The reply brief filed by Defendant Auburn University (Doc. 27 ) is CONSTRUED as a motion to dismiss the complaint on the same grounds presented in the motion to dismiss (Doc. 10 ) filed by Defendant Board of Trustees of Auburn University. 3. Defendant Auburn Universitys motion to di smiss (Doc. 27 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Adrian Ghioroaie-Panaits Title VII color discrimination claim and DENIED in all other respects. 4. Plaintiff Ghioroaie-Panaits Title VII color discrimination claim against Defendant Auburn University (Count IV of the amended complaint (Doc. 21 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/9/2018. (dmn, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ghioroaie-Panait v. The Board of Trustees of Auburn University et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adrian Ghioroaie-Panait
Represented By: Donna Smith Cude
Represented By: John David Saxon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Board of Trustees of Auburn University
Represented By: Enrique Jose Gimenez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Henry Rolle
Represented By: Enrique Jose Gimenez
Represented By: Blake Lee Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?