Burton v. Crow et al (INMATE 2)
| Morgan Jerome Burton, Jr. |
| John Crow, Jacob Walker, III, Robert T. Treese, III, Jessica L. Venitere, Lauryn Lauderdale, Toney Amerson and Richard Converse |
| 3:2018cv00093 |
| February 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Elmore |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
OPINION and ORDER: The 13 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs claims challenging events which occurred on or before 10/24/2012, are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (i) as Plaintiff failed to file the complaint regarding these allegations within the time prescribed by the statute of limitations. 2. Plaintiffs challenge to the constitutionality of his 2012 conviction and/or sentence imposed upon him by the Circui t Court for Lee County, Alabama, are DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time. 3. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii). An appropriate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/30/2018. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
