Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Dillon et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
| Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper |
| Lesia H. Dillon and Gaston Dillon |
| 3:2018cv00457 |
| May 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Russell |
| Gray M Borden |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Gaston Dillon & Lesia H. Dillon; Corporate Disclosures due by 5/14/2018. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(alm, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Gaston Dillon, Lesia H. Dillon from Circuit Court of Russell County, AL, case number 57-CV-2018-900105.00. (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 4602049206) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #3 Exhibit B - Alleged Foreclosure Deed, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Receipt) (alm, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Gaston Dillon, Lesia H. Dillon. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #1 for pdf) (alm, ) |
| COMPLAINT against Gaston Dillon, Lesia H. Dillon, filed by Nationstar Mortgage LLC. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #1 -1 for pdf)(alm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
