Brown v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
| Maurice Antonio Brown |
| Russell County Jail, Theresa Dyer and Officer Randall |
| 3:2018cv00576 |
| June 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Russell |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Wallace Capel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order entered on this date adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/13/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(bes, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The Magistrate Judge's 8 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's claims against the Russell County Jail are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3) Th e Russell County Jail is DISMISSED as a Dft in this action; 4) This action, with respect to Plf's claims against Dfts Dyer and Randall, is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/2/2018. (alm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
