Jin v. Kmin USA, Inc.
Heejoo Jin |
Kmin USA, Inc. |
3:2018cv00693 |
July 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Opelika Office |
Chambers |
Emily C Marks |
Susan Russ Walker |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 0207 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Kmin USA, Inc., Heejoo Jin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Willis, Kathryn) Modified on 9/17/2018 to include additional filer. (dmn, ) |
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Willis, Kathryn) |
Filing 11 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Heejoo Jin. (Kim, Brian) |
***Attorney Ingu Hwang added for Kmin USA, Inc. (dmn, ) (NO PDF, see Doc. #9 for pdf.) |
Filing 10 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Kmin USA, Inc.. (Willis, Kathryn) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Kmin USA, Inc..(Willis, Kathryn) |
Filing 8 Case reassigned to Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks as presiding judge and Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker as referral judge. Chief Judge William Keith Watkins, Honorable Judge David A. Baker no longer assigned to the case. (dmn, ) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER vacating #6 Order Reassigning and Referring Case to Magistrate Judge David A. Baker. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/8/2018. (dmn, ) (NO PDF) |
Filing 6 [VACATED PURSUANT TO 7 TEXT ORDER.] ORDER REASSIGNING AND REFERRING CASE, pursuant to 28 USC 636, to Magistrate Judge Honorable David A. Baker for further proceedings and determination or recommendation as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/3/2018. (alm, ) Modified on 8/8/2018 (dmn, ). |
Filing 5 Case Reassigned to Chief Judge William Keith Watkins as Presiding Judge; Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker no longer assigned to the case as Presiding Judge. (alm, ) |
Filing 4 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons & #1 Complaint signed by Kim Jusan for Kmin USA, Inc. served on 7/31/2018, answer due 8/21/2018. (alm, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Plaintiff Heejoo Jin. (dmn, ) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued; summons and complaint mailed CMRRR to Kmin USA, Inc. (dmn, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kmin USA, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602050129.), filed by Heejoo Jin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt)(dmn, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Heejoo Jin. (dmn, ) (NO PDF, see Doc. #1 for pdf.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jin v. Kmin USA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Heejoo Jin | |
Represented By: | Brian Gene Kim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kmin USA, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Kathryn Morris Willis |
Represented By: | Ingu Hwang |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.