Hooks v. Berryhill (CONSENT)
| Michael Joe Hooks |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 3:2018cv00732 |
| August 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Russell |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order signed by Social Security Administration for Nancy A. Berryhill served on 9/13/2018. (alm, ) |
| Filing 10 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order signed by Emily Sase for U.S. Attorney General served on 9/14/2018. (alm, ) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for Nancy A. Berryhill. (alm, ) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge signed by counsel for Michael Joe Hooks. (alm, ) |
| PURSUANT TO THE #9 CONSENT - ***Attorney James Joseph DuBois for Nancy A. Berryhill added. (No pdf attached to this entry) (alm, ) |
| Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order signed by Illegible for SSA Office of Regional Counsel served on 9/10/2018. (alm, ) |
| Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of summons, complaint, & order of procedure signed by Trenton Adams for US Attorney served on 9/10/2018, answer due for Nancy A. Berryhill on 12/9/2018. (djy, ) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General, & Social Security Office of Regional Counsel; mailed CMRRR with copy of #1 Complaint & #3 Order. (alm, ) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 4602050592. (alm, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Plf is DIRECTED to pay the $400.00 fee on or before 9/7/2018; ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the #1 complaint; plf to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; dft's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing; Copies mailed to counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 8/20/2018. (alm, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Joe Hooks. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(es, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Michael Joe Hooks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hooks v. Berryhill (CONSENT) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | James Joseph DuBois |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Joe Hooks | |
| Represented By: | Micki Beth Stiller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
