Cotner v. Johnson (INMATE 1)
Matthew Edward Cotner |
State of Alabama, Russell County Jail, Steve Johnson and Albert David Johnson |
3:2018cv00764 |
August 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Wallace Capel |
Emily C Marks |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Return Receipt Card showing service of #9 Amended Inmate 1983 Complaint and #10 Order signed by Steven Johnson for Steve Johnson served on 10/10/2018, answer due 11/15/2018. (wcl, ) |
|
Filing 9 AMENDED Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Steve Johnson, filed by Matthew Edward Cotner. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(kh, ) |
|
|
Filing 6 (STRICKEN PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #7 ORDER) AMENDED Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Steve Johnson, Albert David Johnson, filed by Matthew Edward Cotner. (wcl, ) (Main Document 6 replaced on 9/18/2018) (wcl, ). Modified on 9/18/2018 (wcl, ). |
Filing 5 Partial Filing fee received: $ 6.00, receipt number 4602050612. (wcl, ) |
|
|
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Matthew Edward Cotner. (es, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/31/2018 to attach a properly redacted PDF document) (wcl, ). Modified on 8/31/2018 (wcl, ). |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Russell County Jail, State of Alabama, filed by Matthew Edward Cotner.(es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.