Brown v. Ellis et al (INMATE 2)
Maurice Antonio Brown |
Nurse Dyer, Dr. Ellis, Russell County Jail and Lt. Johnson |
3:2018cv00811 |
September 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Wallace Capel |
William Keith Watkins |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 12/4/2018, Plf shall file a response to Dfts' written report, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 11/13/2018. (wcl, ) |
Filing 11 Special Report to Inmate 1983 Complaint by Nurse Dyer, Dr. Ellis, Lt. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L)(Eley, Landon) |
Filing 10 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Nurse Dyer. (Eley, Landon) |
Filing 9 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Dr. Ellis. (Eley, Landon) |
Filing 8 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Lt. Johnson. (Eley, Landon) |
AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for Nurse Dyer, Dr. Ellis, Lt. Johnson (no pdf document attached to this entry) (kh, ) |
Filing 7 ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. #5 ) is ADOPTED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claims against the Russell County Jail are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to ervice of process under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 2. The Russell County Jail is DISMISSED as a defendant. 3. This case with respect to Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/16/2018. (kh, ) |
Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #4 Order signed by J. Jones for Nurse Dyer served on 9/28/2018, answer due 11/5/2018; Dr. Ellis served on 9/28/2018, answer due 11/5/2018; Lt. Johnson served on 9/28/2018, answer due 11/5/2018. (kh, ) |
Filing 5 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: 1. Plaintiff's claims against the Russell County Jail be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 2. The Russell County Jail be DISMISSED as a defendant. 3. This case with respect to Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants be referred to the undersigned for further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 10/10/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 9/26/2018. (kh, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before November 5, 2018; copies mailed to plaintiff; mailed by CMRRR with complaint to named defendants Ellis, Dyer, and Johnson. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 9/24/2018. (kh, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order ; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Russell County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 9/24/2018. (furn: calendar, cashier)(kh, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Maurice Antonio Brown. (beh, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Nurse Dyer, Dr. Ellis, Lt. Johnson, Russell County Jail, filed by Maurice Antonio Brown. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(beh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.