Leonard v. Russell County Sheriff's Office et al (INMATE 2)
William B. Leonard |
S. Parker and Russell County Sheriff's Office |
3:2018cv00985 |
November 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Charles S Coody |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER ON MOTION directing that: (1) def's #9 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; and (2) def Parker is granted an extension from 1/9/2019, to and including 2/8/2019, to file his answer and written report. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/7/19. (djy, ) |
Filing 10 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by S. Parker. (Eley, Landon) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Special Report & Answer re #4 Order to file special report within 40 days of the date of this order, by S. Parker. (Eley, Landon) |
Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING #5 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Plf's 1983 claims against Def Russell County Sheriff's Office are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (2) Def Russell County Sheriff's Office is TERMINATED as a party to this complaint; directing the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment as to Def Russell County Sheriff's Office pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; This case is not closed and is referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/19/18. (Attachments: #1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, ) |
No objections filed to the #5 Recommendation. (No pdf attached to this entry) (alm, ) |
Filing 7 Received partial Filing fee: $ 3.87, receipt number 4602051637 (djy, ) |
Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of complaint & order of procedure signed by Carra Anderson for S. Parker served on 12/3/2018, answer due 1/9/2019. (djy, ) |
Filing 5 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: 1) Plf's claims against the Russell County Sheriff's Office be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 2) The Russell County Sheriff's Office be DISMISSED as a dft; 3) This case with respect to Plf's claims against the remaining dft be referred to the undersigned for further proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 12/13/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/29/2018. (alm, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT and ANSWER on or before 1/9/2019, as further set out in order; copies mailed to plaintiff; mailed by CMRRR with complaint and any and all attachments to def Parker. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/28/18. (djy, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until $350.00 fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ the Russell County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/28/18. Furnished to cashier. (djy, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by William B. Leonard. (es, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against S. Parker, Russell County Sheriff's Office, filed by William B. Leonard.(es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.