Bryant v. Richie et al (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Octavius Shuman Bryant
Defendant: Patrice Richie and Steven Troy Marshall
Case Number: 3:2019cv00596
Filed: August 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Andrew L Brasher
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
2 Judge: Charles S Coody
3 Judge: Emily C Marks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2019 Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Stay, #11 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by Octavius Shuman Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Goggans, Thomas) Modified on 9/27/2019 to clarify the docket text (wcl, ).
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 9/27/2019, Petitioner may file a reply to Respondents' #11 response to Petitioner's motion to stay proceedings in this action. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 9/6/2019. (wcl, )
September 5, 2019 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Stay filed by Steven Troy Marshall, Patrice Richie. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #11 for pdf - Counsel previously e-filed using incorrect civil event "Motion for Misc. Relief") (wcl, )
September 5, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION Opposition to Petitioner Bryant's Motion for Stay by Steven Troy Marshall, Patrice Richie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Court of Criminal Appeals Memorandum, CR-15-1009, #2 Exhibit 2- Certificate of Judgement, CR-15-1009, #3 Exhibit 3- Case Action Summary, CC-15-697.60, #4 Exhibit 4- Court of Criminal Appeals Order, CR-18-0725, #5 Exhibit 5- Certificate of Judgement, CR-18-0725)(Dodd, Stephen)
August 26, 2019 Filing 10 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Steven Troy Marshall. (Dodd, Stephen)
August 23, 2019 Filing 9 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Octavius Shuman Bryant. (Goggans, Thomas)
August 23, 2019 Filing 8 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Patrice Richie. (Dodd, Stephen) Modified on 8/23/2019 to remove Steven Troy Marshall as a filer (wcl, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/26/2019: #1 Corrected Certificate of Service) (wcl, ).
August 23, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen Norwood Dodd on behalf of Steven Troy Marshall, Patrice Richie (Dodd, Stephen) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/26/2019: #1 Corrected Certificate of Service) (wcl, ).
August 23, 2019 AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for Steven Troy Marshall, Patrice Richie. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
August 22, 2019 Filing 6 Response to Order re #5 Order, by Octavius Shuman Bryant. (Goggans, Thomas)
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 9/11/2019, Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner's #4 Motion to Stay Proceedings in this action under 28 USC 2254; further ORDERED that counsel for Petitioner shall provide the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Alabama with copies of this order and Petitioner's 2254 petition with any attachments thereto. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 8/21/2019. (wcl, )
August 21, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to Stay by Octavius Shuman Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Rule 32 petition, #2 Exhibit circuit court order)(Goggans, Thomas)
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: In a footnote in his 2254 petition (see Doc. #1 at 1), Petitioner requests that this case be stayed pending resolution of state court proceedings related to Petitioners Ala.R.Crim.P. 32 petition seeking an out-of-time appeal from the denial of Petitioner's previously filed Rule 32 petition; Petitioner is advised that any request for a court order staying the proceedings in this action must be made by separate motion. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(b). Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 8/20/2019. (wcl, )
August 20, 2019 Filing 2 Case Reassigned to Chief Judge Emily C. Marks as presiding judge and Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr. as referral judge; Honorable Judge Andrew L. Brasher and Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody no longer assigned to the case. (wcl, )
August 19, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 4602054621.), filed by Octavius Shuman Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Receipt)(bes, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryant v. Richie et al (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patrice Richie
Represented By: Stephen Norwood Dodd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Troy Marshall
Represented By: Stephen Norwood Dodd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Octavius Shuman Bryant
Represented By: Aimee Cobb Smith
Represented By: Thomas Martele Goggans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?