Malone v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Randell Lawarn Malone
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2019cv00624
Filed: August 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: L Scott Coogler
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2019 Filing 7 REPLY BRIEF filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit J, #9 Exhibit K, #10 Exhibit L, #11 Exhibit M, #12 Exhibit H (SEALED), #13 Exhibit I (SEALED))(Govan, Thomas)
October 9, 2019 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Copy of #6 order sent to Randall Malone returned in mail with the following notation, "returned to sender-no longer at this address". (NO PDF document attached to this notice). (djy, )
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ON MOTION granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time; further ORDERED that the government be GRANTED an extension from 10/4/2019, to and including 10/25/2019, to file a response addressing the claims presented by the petitioner in his 2255 motion. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 9/27/2019. (wcl, )
September 26, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by United States of America. (Govan, Thomas)
September 24, 2019 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) by Laconya Murray. (Murray, LaConya) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/25/2019: #1 Corrected Certificate of Service) (am, ).
September 17, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas R Govan, Jr on behalf of United States of America (Govan, Thomas)
September 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk to serve a copy of Malone's #1 2255 motion upon the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of AL; The U.S. Attorney is ORDERED to file a response to Malone's #1 2255 motion on or before 10/4/2019, as further set out in Order; further DIRECTING the Clerk to provide a copy of the #1 2255 motion to attorney LaConya Murray; it is ORDERED that on or before 9/24/2019, Ms. Murray shall file with this court an affidavit that addresses all claims of ineffective assistance of counsel presented against her in the #1 2255 motion, as further set out in Order. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 9/3/2019. (Copies furnished as directed)(am, )
August 29, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Randell Lawarn Malone. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Document, #2 Criminal Judgment, #3 Criminal Docket Sheet)(am, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malone v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randell Lawarn Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Robert Randolph Neeley
Represented By: Thomas R Govan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?