21st Mortgage Corporation v. Walker et al
| 21st Mortgage Corporation |
| Jeremy K. Walker |
| Sabrina L. McKinney |
| 3:2019cv00640 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Emily C Marks |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: In accordance with the #3 order entered herewith, and for good cause, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court that this appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to furnish a copy of this order to the Bankruptcy Court. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (furn: Bankruptcy Clerk)(cnw, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. #2 ) is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/15/2019. (cnw, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Appeal by 21st Mortgage Corporation. (Hampton, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 Bankruptcy Clerk's Transmittal of Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number Bankruptcy Petition #: 18-81790. File received, filed by 21st Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal, #2 Order on Objection & Continuing Hearing; Docket entry 52, #3 U.S. Bankruptcy Court Bankruptcy Petition docket 18-81790)(cnw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
