Richardson v. Owens et al (CONSENT)
| John Richardson |
| C. A. Owens & Associates, Inc. and Clyde A. Owens |
| 3:2019cv00672 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Wallace Capel |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/19/2020, at 10:00 AM, in Coutroom 5A before Honorable Judge Wallace Capel Jr.; Jury Trial set for 11/16/2020, in Opelika, AL, before Honorable Judge Wallace Capel Jr.; Amended Pleadings due by 1/3/2020 for the Plf(s) & by 1/31/2020 for the Dft(s); Discovery due by 4/15/2020; Mediation Notice due by 4/20/2020; Dispositive and Daubert Motions due by 5/15/2020, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 10/21/2019. (Furnished: Calendar & KF) (amf, )
|
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for C. A. Owens & Associates, Inc., Clyde A. Owens. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for John Richardson. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Strength, Brian) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #5 Counterclaim, by John Richardson.(Segrest, John) |
| Filing 7 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by John Richardson. (Segrest, John) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable, as further set out in order; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/15/2019; any party wishing to consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction shall complete the appropriate attached form so that the form is received by the Clerk on or before 10/15/2019, as further set out in order; Do NOT electronically file the consent form nor reassignment form into the record. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 9/23/2019. (wcl, )
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint and COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by Clyde A. Owens, C. A. Owens & Associates, Inc..(Strength, Brian) Modified on 9/20/2019 to clarify the docket to reflect the Counterclaim only as to Clyde A. Owens (wcl, ). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for C. A. Owens & Associates, Inc., Clyde A. Owens, John Richardson - (All Parties). (wcl, ) |
| Filing 3 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by C. A. Owens & Associates, Inc.. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Clyde A. Owens. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by C. A. Owens & Associates, Inc., Clyde A. Owens from Circuit Court of Macon County, Alabama, case number 46-cv-19-900114.00. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602054906) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Record, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Filing to State Court, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Receipt) (wcl, ) |
| COMPLAINT against C. A. Owens & Associates, Inc., Clyde A. Owens, filed by John Richardson. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #1 for pdf)(wcl, ) |
| NOTICE of Filing to State Court by C. A. Owens & Associates, Inc., Clyde A. Owens re: filing of #1 Notice of Removal. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #1 for pdf)(wcl, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by John Richardson. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #1 for pdf) (wcl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
