Pugh v. Saul (CONSENT)
| Adrianna Pugh |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2019cv00790 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge E-signed by Counsel for Adrianna Pugh. (cnw, ) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge E-signed by Counsel for Andrew Saul. (cnw, ) |
| Filing 9 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #3 Order, #4 Summons signed by illegible for U. S. Attorney General, served on 11/4/2019. (cnw, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Correction re #6 Return Receipt Card, to attach the correct PDF document of the return receipt card for Office of the Regional Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Correct Main PDF Document to Docket Entry #6 )(wcl, ) |
| Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #3 Order, #4 Summons signed by Social Security Administration for Andrew Saul on 10/24/2019. (cnw, ) |
| Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint and #3 Order signed by Elena Franco for Office of Regional Chief Council served on 10/24/2019. (wcl, ) (Main Document 6 replaced on 11/1/2019) (wcl, ). Modified on 11/1/2019 to attach the correct PDF document of the return receipt card for Office of the Regional Counsel (wcl, ). |
| Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #3 Order, #4 Summons signed by Lawrence B. for U. S. Attorney's office, served on 10/22/2019, answer for Andrew Saul due 2/20/2020. (cnw, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney, Social Security Office of Regional Counsel, and U.S. Attorney General; mailed CMRRR with copy of #1 Complaint & #3 Order. (cnw, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the complaint; plf to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; def's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing. Copies mailed to counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 10/21/2019. (cnw, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adrianna Pugh. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(bes, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Adrianna Pugh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bes, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pugh v. Saul (CONSENT) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adrianna Pugh | |
| Represented By: | Brian Roy Carmichael |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
