Davis v. Saul
| Mary Davis |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2020cv00446 |
| June 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Wallace Capel |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint and #5 Order signed by Emily S. for US Attorney General served on 7/24/2020. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 9
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint and #5 Order signed by no signature for Andrew Saul served on 7/20/2020. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 8
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint and #5 Order signed by Hazel, Tom for SSA Office of Regional Chief Council served on 7/20/2020. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 7
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint and #5 Order signed by Jasmine Smith for US Attorney's Office served on 7/17/2020, answer due 10/15/2020 for Andrew Saul. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney, Social Security Office of Regional Counsel, and U.S. Attorney General; mailed CMRRR with a copy of the #1 Complaint and #5 Order. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the complaint; plaintiff to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; defendant's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 7/14/2020. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing 4
First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mary Davis. (Weinberg, Martin)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDERED that, on or before July 15, 2019, Plaintiff shall amend her pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by completing and filing the court's long-form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is cautioned that, should she fail to complete and file the long for application as instructed by this Order, the undersigned will enter an Order denying Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and further requiring Plaintiff to pay the civil filing fee in full. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 7/1/2020. (kh, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mary Davis. (es, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Mary Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(es, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Davis | |
| Represented By: | Martin E Weinberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
