Whitlow v. Westrock Services, LLC (CONSENT)
Plaintiff: Arthur Whitlow
Defendant: Westrock Services, LLC
Case Number: 3:2020cv00451
Filed: June 26, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Arthur Whitlow. (kh, )
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Westrock Services, LLC. (kh, )
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Kendrick, Kermit)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not later than August 19, 2020, as further set out in order.Additionally, the parties are hereby reminded that each has the right to consent or request reassignment. The parties should now confirm their selection in writing. See Rembert v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2) (the parties are free to withhold consent without fear of adverse substantive consequences). Accordingly, counsel for the parties are DIRECTED to complete the appropriate attached form so that the form is received by the Clerk on or before August 18, 2020. Note: CONSENT FORMS MAY NOW BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 8/12/2020. (kh, )
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Westrock Services, LLC (kh, )
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Westrock Services, LLC.(Kendrick, Kermit)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Westrock Services, LLC. (Kendrick, Kermit)
July 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arthur Whitlow. Westrock Services, LLC served on 7/1/2020, answer due 7/22/2020. (kh, )
July 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Westrock Services, LLC and returned to counsel for personal service by process server. (bes, )
July 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Arthur Whitlow (kh, )
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Arthur Whitlow. (kh, )
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Westrock Services, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602058411.), filed by Arthur Whitlow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Filing Fee Receipt)(kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitlow v. Westrock Services, LLC (CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Whitlow
Represented By: Julian Lenwood McPhillips, Jr.
Represented By: Chase Elliot Estes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Westrock Services, LLC
Represented By: Kermit LaGuin Kendrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?