Pendleton v. Martin et al (INMATE 1)
Plaintiff: Artavis D. Pendleton
Defendant: The Circuit Court of Tallapoosa County, Alabama, Ray Martin and E. Paul Jones
Case Number: 3:2020cv00488
Filed: July 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Stephen Michael Doyle
Referring Judge: Emily C Marks
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Pendleton's failure to file necessary financial information as ordered by this court; Objections to R&R due by 9/16/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 9/2/2020. (amf, )
July 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: DIRECTING the Clerk to return the signature page of the #2 in forma pauperis application to the plf for his signature; It is ORDERED that on or before 8/5/2020, the plf shall file the signed page of the in forma pauperis application and a prison account statement from the inmate account clerk at Donaldson, as further set out in order; DIRECTING the Clerk to provide a copy of this order to the inmate account clerk at Donaldson; further ORDERED that the plf shall immediately inform the court and the dfts of any change in his address, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 7/15/2020. (IFP signature page mailed back to Plf & order mailed to Account Clerk @ Donaldson as directed) (amf, )
July 13, 2020 Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Artavis D. Pendleton. (imm, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 7/15/2020 to reflect the proper division in the case number) (amf, ). Modified on 7/15/2020 (amf, ).
July 13, 2020 Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against E. Paul Jones, Ray Martin, The Circuit Court of Tallapoosa County, Alabama, filed by Artavis D. Pendleton.(imm, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/15/2020 to reflect the proper division in the case number) (amf, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pendleton v. Martin et al (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Circuit Court of Tallapoosa County, Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Paul Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Artavis D. Pendleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?