Clark v. Discover Financial Services (MAG+)
| Umar Clark |
| Discover Financial Services |
| 3:2020cv01065 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Emily C Marks |
| Kelly F Pate |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MOTION to Seal by Umar Clark. (am, )
|
|
No objections filed to the #8 Recommendation. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, )
|
|
Filing 8
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint as ordered by the Court; Objections to R&R due by 6/10/2021. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 5/27/2021. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Plaintiff Umar Clark; Corporate Disclosures due by 5/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(amf, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing that by 5/17/2021, Plf must file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies identified above and fully complies with this Order and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; If the amended complaint fails to comply with this Order and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Magistrate Judge will recommend that the case be dismissed without prejudice, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 5/3/2021. (djy, ) .
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 and #3 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing the clerk to STAY service of process so the Court may conduct its obligatory review of the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 1/6/2021. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER directing that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this case is REFERRED CASE to the United States Magistrate Judge for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any orders or recommendations as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 1/6/2021. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Umar Clark. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION (application) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Umar Clark. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Discover Financial Services, filed by Umar Clark.(djy, ) Modified on 12/30/2020 to correct filed date to reflect as 12/23/2020 (qc/djy, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/30/2020: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (djy, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clark v. Discover Financial Services (MAG+) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Umar Clark | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Discover Financial Services | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
