Hughley v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
Plaintiff: Sylvester Hughley
Defendant: Jay Jones, Andrew Stanley, Clay Thomas and Christopher J. Hughes
Case Number: 3:2021cv00358
Filed: May 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: W Harold Albritton
Referring Judge: Charles S Coody
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT construing document #6 as a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Plaintiff's #6 Notice of Dismissal; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(amf, )
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) The #4 order be and is hereby VACATED to the extent it requires payment of the filing fee in this case and provides those persons having custody of Plaintiff with authority to withhold funds from Plaintiff's inmate account for payment of the filing fee in this case; 2) No funds be collected by correctional officials from Plaintiff for purposes of payment of the filing fee attendant to this case; DIRECTING the Clerk to: 1) Not accept any payments from correctional officials or Plaintiff with respect to payment of the filing fee associated with this case; 2) Provide a copy of this order to the inmate account clerk at the Kilby Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/21/2021. (Furnished: Cashier) (Copy mailed to Account Clerk at Kilby CF as directed) (amf, )
June 17, 2021 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sylvester Hughley, as CONSTRUED in the Court's #8 Order. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #6 for PDF) (amf, )
June 17, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION to Withdraw #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint by Sylvester Hughley, CONSTRUED as a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, pursuant to the Court's #8 Order. (dmn, ) Modified on 6/21/2021 (amf, ).
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 6/23/2021 the plf shall file an amended complaint, as further set out in order; Amended Pleadings due by 6/23/2021; the Clerk is DIRECTED to provide him with a copy of the form used by prisoners to file 1983 complaints. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/3/2021. (bes, )
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 (VACATED PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #7 ORDER) ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER granting #3 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Kilby CF. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/3/2021. (Furnished: Cashier) (amf, ) Modified on 6/21/2021 (amf, ).
June 3, 2021 Filing 3 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Sylvester Hughley. (amf, )
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 6/14/2021 the plaintiff shall file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a jail account statement, as further set out in order; DIRECTING the Clerk (i) provide the plaintiff with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and (ii) furnish a copy of this order to the inmate account clerk at the Kilby Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/24/2021. (Copies furnished as directed) (amf, )
May 19, 2021 Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Christopher J. Hughes, Jay Jones, Andrew Stanley, Clay Thomas, filed by Sylvester Hughley.(NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(hrs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hughley v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Stanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clay Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher J. Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sylvester Hughley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?