Pinnacle Bank v. Cox (CONSENT)
| Pinnacle Bank |
| Patrick Cox |
| 3:2021cv00626 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge e-signed by Counsel for (PLF) Pinnacle Bank. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 12
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge e-signed by Counsel for (DFT) Patrick Cox. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 11
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Parrott, Evan)
|
|
Filing 10
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Patrick Cox re #8 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Brannan, James)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable, as further set out in order; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/29/2021; counsel for the parties are DIRECTED to complete the appropriate attached form so that the form is received by the Clerk on or before 11/1/2021; Do NOT electronically file the consent form nor the reassignment form into the record. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 10/22/2021. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 8
Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Patrick Cox; Corporate Disclosures due by 10/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order and Sample Format)(bes, )
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (DFT) Patrick Cox. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 6
Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Patrick Cox.(Brannan, James)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pinnacle Bank. Patrick Cox served on 9/23/2021, answer due 10/14/2021. (Parrott, Evan)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Patrick Cox and returned to Counsel for service by process server. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (PLF) Pinnacle Bank. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Pinnacle Bank. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Patrick Cox ( Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number 4602064717.), filed by Pinnacle Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Receipt)(bes, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pinnacle Bank v. Cox (CONSENT) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pinnacle Bank | |
| Represented By: | Evan N. Parrott |
| Represented By: | Jayna Partain Lamar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Patrick Cox | |
| Represented By: | James Bernard Brannan, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
