Sherrell v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
Plaintiff: Montego Sherrell
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 3:2021cv00835
Filed: December 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by PO BOX SSA for Kilolo Kijakazi, served on 1/18/2022. (amf, )
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (amf, )
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for Plaintiff Montego Sherrell. (amf, )
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order ***PURSUANT TO THE #9 CONSENT - Attorney James Joseph DuBois for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi added. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, )
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Emily Sase for U.S. Attorney General, served on 1/12/2022. (amf, )
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Niarchos Wright for Social Security Office of Regional Counsel, served on 1/11/2022. (amf, )
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of summons, order & complaint signed by Elizabeth G Anderson for US Attorney served on 1/6/2022, answer due for Kilolo Kijakazi on 4/6/2022. (djy, )
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General, & Social Security Office of Regional Counsel; mailed by CMRRR with #1 Complaint & #3 Order. (amf, )
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the complaint; plaintiff to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; defendant's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing; Copies mailed to counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 1/4/2022. (amf, )
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Montego Sherrell. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(bll, )
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Montego Sherrell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sherrell v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Montego Sherrell
Represented By: Hannah Grace Lindsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: James Joseph DuBois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?