Getman v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
| Rachel Getman |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 3:2022cv00038 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order signed by Social Security Administration for Kilolo Kijakazi, served on 2/22/2022. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 10
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Emily Sase for U.S. Attorney General, served on 2/14/2022. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Choi on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Choi, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 8
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Hazel Tom for Social Security Office of Regional Counsel, served on 2/7/2022. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 7
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by E. Anderson for U.S. Attorney's Office, served on 2/7/2022, answer due 5/8/2022 for Kilolo Kijakazi. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi.(amf, )
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for Plaintiff Rachel Getman. (amf, )
|
|
***PURSUANT TO THE #6 CONSENT - Attorney James Joseph DuBois for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi added. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General, & Social Security Office of Regional Counsel; mailed by CMRRR with #1 Complaint & #3 Order. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the complaint; Plaintiff to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; Defendant's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing; Copies mailed to counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 2/3/2022. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rachel Getman. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(hrs, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Rachel Getman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hrs, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Getman v. Kijakazi (CONSENT) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rachel Getman | |
| Represented By: | Hannah Grace Lindsley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | James Joseph DuBois |
| Represented By: | Sarah Elizabeth Choi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
