Saxby v. Jash, Inc. et al
| Douglas Saxby |
| Jash, Inc. and Sanjeev Patel |
| 3:2022cv00140 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Jerusha T Adams |
| Emily C Marks |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Lowery, Courtney)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Court's 4/14/2022 Order (doc. #12 ) is VACATED. It is further ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan and utilizing one of the undersigned's trial terms shall be filed as soon as practicable, as further set out in order. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/23/2022. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 5/9/2022. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 13
Case Reassigned to Chief Judge Emily C. Marks as presiding Judge and Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams as referral Judge. Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams no longer assigned to the case as presiding Judge. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 12
(VACATED PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #14 ORDER) RULE 26(f) ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable, as further set out in order. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/16/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 4/14/2022. (cwl, ) Modified on 5/9/2022 (cwl, ).
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the parties should now make their selection in writing to consent or request reassignment. The parties are DIRECTED to complete the appropriate attached form so that the form is received by the Clerk on or before 5/6/2022, as further set out in order. Do NOT electronically file the consent form nor reassignment form into the record. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 4/14/2022. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 10
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Jash, Inc., Sanjeev Patel re #9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (McKoon, James)
|
|
Filing 9
Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Jash, Inc.; Sanjeev Patel. Corporate Disclosures due by 4/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Conflict Statement Standing Order & Sample Format)(cwl, )
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (DEFS) Jash, Inc., Sanjeev Patel. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Jash, Inc., Sanjeev Patel.(McKoon, James)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Douglas Saxby. Sanjeev Patel served on 3/26/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. (Lowery, Courtney) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/1/2022: #1 Executed Summons) (cwl, ).
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Douglas Saxby. Jash, Inc. served on 3/26/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. (Lowery, Courtney) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/1/2022: #1 Executed Summons) (cwl, ).
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Jash, Inc., Sanjeev Patel and mailed to counsel via USPS for service via process server. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (PLF) Douglas Saxby. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Douglas Saxby. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 1
ORIGINAL COMPLAINT against Jash, Inc., Sanjeev Patel ( Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number 4602066322.), filed by Douglas Saxby. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 receipt)(cwl, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
