Gideon v. Auburn University et al
| Heather Gideon |
| Auburn University, Tajuan Sellars and Melinda Camus |
| 3:2022cv00176 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| R Austin Huffaker |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 48 ) as to Count Three is GRANTED. Count One is dismissed by concession of the Plaintiff. 2) As there are no further claims, a separate judgment will issue. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 4/19/2024. (CWL)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (2) Count One shall proceed against Dr. Melinda Camus in her official capacity for prospective injunctive relief. In all other respects, Count One is dismissed; (3) Counts Two and Four are dismissed without prejudice; (4) As the Defendants did not move to dismiss Count Three, Count Three will proceed as pleaded; (5) Defendants Auburn University and Tajuan Sellars are dismissed as parties. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 11/28/2022. (cwl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
