Hutto v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
| Wendy Hutto |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 3:2022cv00545 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Wendy Hutto. (am, )
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Kilolo Kijakazi. (am, )
|
|
Filing 9
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, Complaint, & #3 Order signed by Social Security Administration for Social Security Administration, served on 10/3/2022. (am, )
|
|
***Pursuant to the #10 Consent - Attorney James Joseph DuBois for Kilolo Kijakazi added. (NO PDF attached to this entry) (am, )
|
|
Filing 8
Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #3 Order, & Summons signed by Social Security Administration, served on 9/19/2022. (am, )
|
|
Filing 7
Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #3 Order, & Summons signed by illegible for US Attorney General, Served on 9/22/2022. (am, )
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Choi on behalf of All Defendants (Choi, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 5
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by E. Andersen for U.S. Attorney's Office, served on 9/15/2022, answer due 12/14/2022 for Kilolo Kijakazi. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General, & Social Security Office of General Counsel Program Litigation Office 5; mailed by CMRRR with #1 Complaint & #3 Order. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the complaint; plaintiff to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; defendant's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing. Copies mailed to counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 9/14/2022. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Wendy Hutto. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(bll, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Wendy Hutto. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 12/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bll, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hutto v. Kijakazi (CONSENT) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wendy Hutto | |
| Represented By: | Hannah Grace Lindsley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | James Joseph DuBois |
| Represented By: | Sarah Elizabeth Choi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
