Bratton v. Kijakazi
| Megan Bratton |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 3:2022cv00644 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: the Commissioner's Answer to Social Security Complaint and Administrative Record are due within 60 days after entry of the Clerk's notice of service; plaintiff to file brief in support within 30 days of filing of the answer and administrative record; defendant's responsive brief due within 30 days of plaintiff's brief filing; plaintiff may file a reply brief within 14 days of responsive brief filing. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 12/14/2022. (bes, )
|
|
Notice: Social Security Case Service - Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 USC 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No Summons shall issue. Kilolo Kijakazi answer due 2/13/2023. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Choi on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Choi, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER granting the #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Kira Treyvus and denying as moot the #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 11/8/2022. (No PDF attached to this entry) (bes, )
|
|
Filing 3
Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 75 receipt number AALMDC-3317630.) by Megan Bratton. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Treyvus, Kira)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave for Kira Treyvus to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Megan Bratton (Filing fee $ 75, Receipt # 681) . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Receipt)(hrr, ) Modified on 11/7/2022 to reflect entry as a PHV motion & not a IFP motion (amf, ).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 680), filed by Megan Bratton. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 2/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(hrr, ) Modified on 11/7/2022 to reflect the correct receipt number (amf, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bratton v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Megan Bratton | |
| Represented By: | Kira Treyvus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Elizabeth Choi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
