Jackson v. Brock et al (INMATE 2)
| KyJuan Derrier Jackson |
| Zachary Brock and Matthew Jared Collins |
| 3:2023cv00452 |
| July 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Charles S Coody |
| R Austin Huffaker |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| No objections received re #4 Recommendation. (no pdf attached) (cwl, ) |
| Filing 4 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this 42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Objections to R&R due by 9/7/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/24/2023. (cwl, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Lee County Detention Center. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/1/2023. (furn: Cashier) (mailed as directed) (bes, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by KyJuan Derrier Jackson. (tls, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Zachary Brock, Matthew Jared Collins, filed by KyJuan Derrier Jackson.(tls,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
