Smith v. Golden State Foods
Darrell Smith |
Golden State Foods |
3:2023cv00500 |
August 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Chad W Bryan |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Golden State Foods.(Miller, Shannon) |
Filing 11 ORDER: the parties are hereby DIRECTED to complete and return the appropriate form so that it is received by the Clerk of Court on or before October 16, 2023, as further set out in order. The consent form should NOT be electronically filed into the record. Do NOT electronically file the reassignment form into the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chad W. Bryan on 9/14/2023. (cwl, ) |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion to extend the responsive pleading deadline to October 16, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chad W. Bryan on 9/14/2023. (no pdf attached) (cwl, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (DEF) Golden State Foods (cwl, ) |
Filing 8 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Golden State Foods. (Miller, Shannon) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Golden State Foods. (Miller, Shannon) Modified on 9/13/2023 to correct motion event (cwl, ). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Darrell Smith. Golden State Foods served on 8/25/2023, answer due 9/15/2023. (Calamusa, Rocco) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Golden State Foods. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (cwl, ) (Main Document 5 replaced on 8/18/2023 to upload the correct PDF) (cwl, ). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (PLF) Darrell Smith (cwl, ) |
Filing 3 Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Chad W. Bryan. (cwl, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Darrell Smith. (Calamusa, Rocco) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/18/2023 to correct the division on the PDF) (cwl, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Golden State Foods ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AALMDC-3490658.), filed by Darrell Smith. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 11/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Calamusa, Rocco) Modified on 8/18/2023 to add jury demand & to clean up text (cwl, ). (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/18/2023 to correct the division on the PDF) (cwl, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smith v. Golden State Foods | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Darrell Smith | |
Represented By: | Rocco Calamusa, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Golden State Foods | |
Represented By: | Shannon Leigh Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.