Truist Bank v. Southeastern Disaster Relief Services, LLC et al
| Truist Bank f/k/a Branch Banking and Trust Company, Truist Bank and Branch Banking and Trust Company |
| Southeastern Disaster Relief Services, LLC, Jason McDaniel and Kimberlee McDaniel |
| 3:2024cv00131 |
| February 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Emily C Marks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Truist Bank f/k/a Branch Banking and Trust Company. (Sefton, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Truist Bank f/k/a Branch Banking and Trust Company. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 5/22/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Note 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Security Agreement, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - UCC Financing Statement, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Guaranty Agreements of Jason and Kimberlee McDaniel, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Note 2, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - Forbearance Agreement, #7 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #8 Proposed Summons Summons for Southeastern Disaster Relief Services, #9 Proposed Summons Summons for Jason McDaniel, #10 Proposed Summons Summons for Kimberlee McDaniel) (Sefton, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
