Faulk v. Russell County et al (INMATE 3)
| James Arlandis Faulk |
| Russell County, Alabama District Court, Hon. Walter Lee Gray, III, Hon. Richard L. Chancey and David Jones |
| 3:2024cv00281 |
| May 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Emily C Marks |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: it is: ORDERED that by May 29, 2024, Plaintiff must submit an inmate account statement from the Russell County Jail reflecting the average monthly balance in his inmate account and the average monthly deposits to his account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 5/14/2024. (c/s as directed) (LAB)
|
| Filing 3 Case Assigned to Chief Judge Emily C. Marks as Presiding Judge and Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle as Referring Judge. (LAB) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by James Arlandis Faulk. (TPS) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Alabama District Court, Richard L. Chancey, Walter Lee Gray, III, David Jones, Russell County, filed by James Arlandis Faulk.(TPS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
