Jennings v. Hamlin et al
| Willie . Jennings |
| Ray Latham, Ricky Shaddox, Don Hamton, Keith Warren, Johnny Hamlin, Joe Fickle and Don Hampton |
| 1:2018cv01950 |
| November 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee of $34.30, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days,. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 1/4/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Joe Fickle, Johnny Hamlin, Don Hampton, Ray Latham, Ricky Shaddox, Keith Warren, filed by Willie. Jennings.(KEK) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that the plaintiff shall notify the court within 15 days whether he wishes to continue with this action pursuant to 42:1983 and correct the deficiencies or dismiss this action and file a habeas petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 12/7/2018. (KAM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Willie. Jennings. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joe Fickle, Johnny Hamlin, Don Hamton, Ray Latham, Ricky Shaddox, Keith Warren, filed by Willie. Jennings.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
