Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Harris v. City of San Diego, San Diego Police Department
as 3:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Keith Warren Harris
Defendant:
City of San Diego, San Diego Police Department, Officer Chad Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Hood v. Jordan Restaurant Group HQ LLC d/b/a Hen Quarter et al
as 2:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
Zak Hood
Defendant:
Jordan Restaurant Group HQ LLC d/b/a Hen Quarter, Jordan Restaurant Group, LLC, Jordan Hospitality Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Warren v. Entzel
as 1:2020cv01275
Petitioner:
Bryan Keith Warren
Respondent:
F. Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv01268
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, FCI Pekin and F. Entzel
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24276
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH WARREN PIERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chateau Somera, LLC v. Keith Warren
as 2:2019cv09035
Defendant:
Keith Warren
Plaintiff:
Chateau Somera, LLC
Caldwell v. Mathews et al
as 1:2019cv00102
Defendant:
John Keith Warren, Johnny Hamlin, Chris Mathews and others
Plaintiff:
Sammy Lee Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Hamlin et al
as 1:2018cv01950
Defendant:
Ray Latham, Ricky Shaddox, Don Hamton and others
Plaintiff:
Willie . Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WARREN v. ECKARD et al
as 2:2016cv00052
Petitioner:
KEITH WARREN
Respondent:
J.A. ECKARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
