Muncher v NCR Corporation

Plaintiff: Steven A Muncher
Defendant: NCR Corporation
Case Number: 2:2016cv00782
Filed: May 11, 2016
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 27, 2017 57 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 51 MOTION to Amend/Correct 23 Amended Complaint, DENYING 27 MOTION to Dismiss. The Stay previously entered in this case is hereby LIFTED. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file an Amended Report of Parties Planning no later than July 18, 2017. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 6/27/2017. (JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muncher v NCR Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven A Muncher
Represented By: Jonathan H Waller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NCR Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?