AAL Group Ltd v. Black Hall Aerospace Inc et al
AAL Group Ltd |
Black Hall Aerospace Inc, Paul Daigle and Keith Woolford |
2:2017cv00399 |
March 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Southern Office |
Madison |
John H England |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 258 MEMORANDUM OPINION - The court WILL GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART Mr. Woolfords motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The court WILL NOT DISMISS Count Two. The court WILL DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Counts Three, Four, Five, and Seven in their enti rety. The court WILL NOT DISMISS the part of Count Six relating to the conversion of the SES check, but WILL DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE the remainder of that count. The court WILL DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE the entirety of Count Eight. The court will enter a separate order consistent with this opinion. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 7/10/2018. (KEK) |
Filing 169 MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/5/18. (SAC ) |
Filing 65 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 19 AAL Group's motion to strike Exhibit B to Defendants' motion to dismiss- To the extent that Defendants filed Exhibit B to prove the existence of the amended complaint and the allegations made in it in the Black Hall Aerospace case, the court DENIES the motion to strike; the court will not consider Exhibit B for any other purpose. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 10/23/17. (SAC ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.